Interior Minister Priti Patel said: “Terrorists and paedophiles continue to use the Internet to spread their hate messages, plan attacks on our citizens and target the most vulnerable. As Minister of the Interior, I am determined to do everything in my power to stop them. This historic agreement will significantly expedite investigations and allow our enforcement agencies to protect the public. This is just one example of the sustainable security partnership we have with the United States, and I look forward to continuing to work with them and with global partners to combat these heinous crimes. The first specific factor defining adequate protection of citizens` rights, compliance with the Budapest Conventions, is respected by the UK`s compliance with the convention. This is one of the factors or requirements of the CLOUD Act that are not explicitly addressed in the agreement, as they are respected by UK national legislation. U.S. recipients of an English OPO may request that an OPO be amended or discharged from the English Crown Courts and may eventually challenge them in the High Court through a court remedy. As with other national search and manufacturing warrants, an OPO could face a large number of potential challenges depending on the facts of each case. For example, there may be arguments that a request is too broad, that the recipient is not in possession or control of the data, that it is not in the public interest for all or part of the electronic data to be generated or retrieved, or that other conditions that must be met to grant an OPO are not met. The two governments have agreed on conditions that largely remove restrictions on a wide range of investigations and do not target residents of the other country and assure suppliers that the disclosures under the agreement are consistent with data protection legislation. Each has also committed to obtaining the other`s authorization before using the data obtained by the agreement for prosecutions concerning the essential interest of one party – in particular the prosecutions of the United States and the British justice system. The agreement recognizes the last factor – the commitment to a free and open internet – only by stating that one of its objectives is to “protect privacy, civil liberties and an open internet.” Like the human rights analysis, this provision appears to be based on a substantive view of the law of the United Kingdom and the United Kingdom and the United Kingdom and not on a particular clause of the agreement.
 www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-and-us-sign-landmark-data-access-agreement We anticipate that we will publish a copy of the agreement in the near future after the communication of Congress and Parliament. The agreement treats these procedures in two ways. First, it includes the targeting of American people that inhibits language, as requested by both 2353 (b) (2) and 2353 (b) (3). The CLOUD Act stipulates that no U.S.-based person or person must be intentionally targeted; that an order should not be used to target a non-US value. Person to investigate a U.S. investigation